He kept his promise for 24 hours.
Then he caved in. And it is the most common management mistake there is.
Last week, at a hustings in Makerfield, Andy Burnham told a room full of WASPI women he would stick by them because "they deserve some recompense." In classic Burnham style it was warm, decent, authentic. It was exactly what the room wanted to hear.
Within a day, after a Labour backlash, he ruled out any cash payout at all.
He did not change his mind on the facts. They were the same on Thursday as they were on Wednesday. What changed was the room. The applause moved, so he moved with it. The Institute for Government called it stumbling "at his first spending test" and said he would need to "contain his crowd-pleasing instincts."
The tell
Here is why this matters to you, and it has nothing to do with politics.
Burnham is one of the most popular politicians in Britain. People really like him, he's pretty likeable to be fair. And the thing people who know him keep saying is the same thing every time. The Guardian's North of England editor calls his biggest flaw "an overriding need to be liked." A journalist who shadowed him for six years put it plainer. "A natural need to please people."
Sound familiar?
Because that is the affiliative manager. Word for word.
Kind isn't nice
For years now we have told managers to be kind. Look after your people. Build psychological safety. All true. All worth doing.
But somewhere along the way a lot of people heard something else. They heard "be nice." And nice is not the same thing.
Kind is telling someone the truth they need to hear. Nice is telling them what they want to hear. One helps them. The other helps you, because it gets you out of the awkward bit and keep things all nice and cosy.
Same with psychological safety. It does not mean a place where nobody ever feels a moment of friction. It means people feel secure enough to challenge you, raise the problem, and take hard feedback without falling apart. That is the opposite of being soft.
Look at Burnham's own inner circle. Loyal, long-serving, built to enable him rather than challenge him. Twenty years of yes. A team that only ever agrees with you is not a safe team. It is a blind-spot machine.
What it costs you
Affiliative is the style most of us reach for, including myself. We care about our people and, let's admit it, we want to be liked. The atmosphere is pleasant. People get on. And it is almost never the style the situation actually needs.
Here is what it costs. Your best performer leaves because nobody is stretching them. Standards drift because nobody calls it out. Problems stack up because nobody wants to be the one to raise them. And the cruel bit, it is not even a nice place to work, because nobody knows where they stand.
A warm yes you cannot honour does more damage than an honest no. The WASPI women would have taken a straight "I can't promise that" on the Wednesday. What they got was a yes, pulled back in a day. That is worse. That is the whole lesson.
He can do the hard stuff
Now, to be fair to the man. Burnham can do the hard thing. He spent seven years on Hillsborough, naming his own party as the people who failed those families, long after it stopped being convenient. He re-regulated Manchester's buses, on time and on budget, when plenty said it could not be done.
So it is not that he cannot say no. It is that when the room turns, the need to be liked wins. The capability is there. The instinct overrides it.
Think about that. Because it is true of most affiliative managers too. You are not incapable of the hard conversation. You just let the discomfort talk you out of it.
I learned this one the hard way. Early on, when I was a new manager, I did this a few times. Someone ambitious would come to me wanting a promotion. I didn't know how to handle it, so I'd reassure them. "You deserve it. Keep going, do these things, and we'll get you there." Deep down I knew it was a long shot. So when I couldn't deliver, I pissed them off, and they left. If I'd just been honest, said this isn't likely but here's what I can do instead, they still might have gone. But they'd have gone on good terms, not feeling lied to.
From nice to useful
The fix is not to turn into a tyrant. Your team would think you'd lost the plot. The shift is smaller than that.
Next time your gut says "don't worry, I'll sort it," stop. Ask instead. "Talk me through it." "What have you tried?" "What would you do if I wasn't here?" You still care. You are still on their side. You are just being useful instead of nice.
And when you have to say no, say it on the Wednesday. Not after the applause has moved. People can handle a no. What they cannot handle is a yes they cannot rely on.
Be useful, not nice,
|
|
Arran Russell
Founder, Set The Tone
|
PS: If this stung a bit, good. It means you care enough to notice. That was never the problem. What you do next is.
PPS. By the way, if you read that and recognised yourself, it's worth knowing how heavily you actually lean this way. The Leadership Style Self-Assessment shows you which style you default to under pressure, and what it costs you when you overuse it. If the affiliative one stung, that's half your answer already.
